- Dialogue - lists.wedgeblade.net

FW:
by Al Lingo 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

Whats up tell me how you feel tell me how you feel http://www.cnbc.com-2-story.net/ we should talk about this get back to me if you can

2 2

More Meg Wheatley
by SteveHar 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

Randy found this last year; a really clear-headed suggestion from Meg Wheatley: Taking Social Innovation to Scale https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SjhNrNX34Ctl9EcWuafNN4W1oDIYlnL0PT0qm2Z… -- Message from: Steve Skype: consultharrington Social Media: LinkedIn, FaceBook, Google + Hangouts

1 0

More Meg Wheatley
by steve har 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

Randy found this last year; a really clear-headed suggestion from Meg Wheatley: Taking Social Innovation to Scale https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SjhNrNX34Ctl9EcWuafNN4W1oDIYlnL0PT0qm2Z… -- Steve -- Steve Harrington

1 0

Question
by Doris Hahn 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

After I read the little dialogue in which Randy and Jack suggested that Meg Wheatley's book would address the issue, I did a really uncharacteristic thing (at about 9:30 p.m.). I immediately went to Amazon and ordered the book. Now that I have read (and appreciate) it, I want to remember what the issue was to which the book was the answer. Can you refresh my memory--only on this one issue--I won't ask you to do a sweeping job on my memory[?]. I do think Meg Wheatley does a good job, and I certainly believe her answers may be helpful, though I think the spirit work we did is far more sweeping and with more depth. What she has that we didn't is today's world with current issues. Actually, I never did like the "warrior" image, because it is so masculine. However, it now carries a lot of other baggage for me, including the personal (hate, anger, etc) along with the outward destructiveness of war. Maybe this is good archive work if we haven't already done it. In any case, it is a current conversation worth having. Of course, we used war images all the time, but surely there are other current ones that could be motivating. What would we drag out of our corporate memory or current innovation that could lead the way in today's world? Doris Hahn

4 4

Great Tedx Talk - our moment in history
by LAURELCG＠aol.com 18 Feb '13

18 Feb '13

_Living a Transformational Life_ (http://www.facebook.com/l/OAQG0pphy/integrallife.com/video/living-transform…) _integrallife.com_ (http://www.facebook.com/l/OAQG0pphy/integrallife.com/video/living-transform… -life) In this special TEDx presentation, Robb Smith, social entrepreneur and co-founder of Chrysallis and Integral Life, discusses how we must learn how to live a transformational life if we want to thrive in the complex world we all now inhabit.

1 0

A P O C A L Y P S E !!
by David Zahrt 17 Feb '13

17 Feb '13

I still have friends in Iowa. This is what I got last week. *I THINK YOU CAN SEE I'M FORWARDING THIS TO YOU. IT SEEMS TO BE WELL PUT AND ON TARGET* *David* From: Mark Edward*s* Sent: 10 Feb 2013 18:30:44 GMT To: IOWA-NATIVE-PLANTS(a)LIST.UIOWA.EDU Subject: [IOWA-NATIVE-PLANTS] Food for Thought Rationally Speaking, We Are All Apocalyptic Now <http://mail.yahoo.com/> ** >From Robert Jensen Updates<http://us-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=eis30cjomtfqb> *http://truth-out.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=14322&Itemid=228* Rationally Speaking, We Are All Apocalyptic Now Friday, 08 February 2013 By Robert Jensen, Truthout | Op-Ed ---------- If we are rational and consider objective scientific evidence of environmental collapse including groundwater depletion, topsoil loss, chemical contamination, ocean dead zones, species extinction, bio-diversity reduction and climate disruption, we need to be apocalypticists, argues Robert Jensen, the author of We Are All Apocalyptic Now: On the Responsibilities of Teaching, Preaching, Reporting, Writing, and Speaking Out. ---------- We are all apocalyptic now, or at least we should be, if we are rational. Because "apocalyptic" is typically associated with religious fanaticism and death cults -- things that rational people tend not to take literally or seriously -- this claim requires some explanation. First, a definition: The term is most commonly used in reference to the Book of Revelation, also known as The Apocalypse of John, the final book of the Christian New Testament. The two terms are synonymous in their original meaning - "revelation" from Latin and "apocalypse" from Greek both mean a lifting of the veil, a disclosure of something that had been hidden. Second, the formulation "we are all (fill in the blank) now" has long been a way to assert that certain ideas have become the norm: "We are all Keynesians now," said Milton Friedman in 1965, for instance, or to express solidarity: "We are all New Yorkers now," said many non-New Yorkers after 9/11. Rather than claiming divine inspiration, we can come to greater clarity about the desperate state of the ecosphere and its human inhabitants through evidence and reason. It is time for a calm, measured apocalypticism that recognizes that the ecosphere sets norms, which we have ignored for too long, and that we need to develop a new sense of solidarity among humans and with the larger living world. So, speaking apocalyptically need not leave us stuck in a corner with the folks predicting lakes of fire, rivers of blood or bodies lifted up to the heavens. Instead, it can focus our attention on ecological realities and on the unjust and unsustainable human systems that have brought us to this point. This "revelation" is simple: We've built a world based on the assumption that we will have endless energy to subsidize endless economic expansion, which was supposed to magically produce justice. That world is over, both in reality and in dreams. Either we begin to build a different world, or there will be no world capable of sustaining a large-scale human presence. If that's not clear: When we take seriously what physics, chemistry and biology tell us about the health of the living world on which we depend, we all should be thinking apocalyptically. Look at any crucial measure of the ecosphere -- groundwater depletion, topsoil loss, chemical contamination, increased toxicity in our own bodies, the number and size of "dead zones" in the oceans, accelerating extinction of species and reduction of biodiversity, and the ultimate game-changer of climate disruption -- and ask a simple question: Where we are heading? Scientists these days are talking about tipping points and planetary boundaries, about how human activity is pushing the planet beyond its limits. If we look honestly at the state of the world, it is difficult not to conclude that we are in end times of sorts -- not the end of the physical world, but the end of the First-World way of living and the end of the systems on which that life is based. I know that invoking the terms "apocalypse" and "end times" triggers many people's experiences with arrogant religious people who preach about deliverance fantasies. My message is not about a rapture that can be predicted, but about ruptures in the ecological and social fabrics that are underway and accelerating. No matter how carefully I craft these statements -- no matter how often I deny a claim to special gifts of prognostication, no matter now clearly I reject supernatural explanations or solutions -- many people refuse to take this analysis seriously. Some people joke about "Mr. Doom and Gloom." Others suggest that such talk is no different than conspiracy theorists' ramblings about how international bankers, secret cells of communists, or crypto-fascists are using the United Nations to create a one-world government. Even the most measured and careful talk of the coming dramatic change in the place of humans on Earth leads to accusations that one is unnecessarily alarmist, probably paranoid and certainly irrelevant in serious discussions about social and ecological issues. In the United States, people expect talk of the future to be upbeat, based on those assumptions of endless expansion and perpetual progress, or at least maintenance of our "way of life." Even those who realize the danger of such fanciful thinking are hesitant to speak too bluntly, out of fear of seeming crazy. A calm apocalypticism is not crazy, but rather can help us confront honestly the crises of our time and strategize constructively about possible responses. We can struggle to understand -- to the best of our ability, without succumbing to magical thinking -- the state of the ecosphere and the impediments to sensible action in our societies. This struggle to understand led me to write a short polemic, We Are All Apocalyptic Now: On the Responsibilities of Teaching, Preaching, Reporting, Writing, and Speaking Out (in print at http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/148195847X/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&p… and on Kindle athttp://www.amazon.com/dp/B00BAWQO84) The book's message is simple: The big systems that structure our world, especially capitalism and the extractive economy, are incompatible with social justice and ecological sustainability.**** **** Those who have opportunities to write and speak out have a responsibility to articulate the radical analysis necessary to understand the problems and begin to identify solutions. To think apocalyptically is not to give up on ourselves, but only to give up on the arrogant stories -- religious and secular -- that we modern humans have been telling about ourselves. Our hope for a decent future -- indeed, any hope for even the idea of a future -- depends on our ability to tell stories not of how humans have ruled the world, but how we can live in the world. We are all apocalyptic now, whether we like it or not. --------------- Robert Jensen is a professor in the School of Journalism at the University of Texas at Austin and board member of the Third Coast Activist Resource Center in Austin. We Are All Apocalyptic Now: On the Responsibilities of Teaching, Preaching, Reporting, Writing, and Speaking Out is online in print at http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/148195847X/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&p… and on Kindle athttp://www.amazon.com/dp/B00BAWQO84. Jensen is also the author of Arguing for Our Lives: A User’s Guide to Constructive Dialogue (City Lights, coming in April 2013); All My Bones Shake: Seeking a Progressive Path to the Prophetic Voice, (Soft Skull Press, 2009); Getting Off: Pornography and the End of Masculinity (South End Press, 2007); The Heart of Whiteness: Confronting Race, Racism and White Privilege (City Lights, 2005); Citizens of the Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity (City Lights, 2004); and Writing Dissent: Taking Radical Ideas from the Margins to the Mainstream (Peter Lang, 2002). Jensen is also co-producer of the documentary film “Abe Osheroff: One Foot in the Grave, the Other Still Dancing” (Media Education Foundation, 2009), which chronicles the life and philosophy of the longtime radical activist.**** **** An extended interview Jensen conducted with Osheroff is online at http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~rjensen/freelance/abeosheroffinterview.htm. Jensen can be reached at rjensen(a)austin.utexas.edu and his articles can be found online athttp://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~rjensen/index.html.**** To join an email list to receive articles by Jensen, go to http://www.thirdcoastactivist.org/jensenupdates-info.html. Twitter: @jensenrobertw.-- “Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circles of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty." -- Albert Einstein ------------------------------ Iowa Native Plants mailing list Iowa-Native-Plants(a)uiowa.edu <Iowa-Native-Plants(a)uiowa.edu> http://atmos.cgrer.uiowa.edu/herbarium/MailingList.htm The Iowa Native Plants Mailing List provides a forum for those interested in Iowa's natural vegetation and in general conservation issues. Another objective is to promote the Iowa Native Plant Society. This list is owned and managed by Diana Horton, and sponsored by the University of Iowa Department of Biology. For assistance, contact Diana Horton, diana-horton(a)uiowa.edu <diana-horton(a)uiowa.edu>

3 2

Fwd: Helen Newkirk's Memorial - Program and Eulogy
by Carol Crow 16 Feb '13

16 Feb '13

Dear Friends, Again I am forwarding these items on behalf of the Newkirk family - the Eulogy and the Memorial Service program for their mother - Helen Newkirk. They have deeply appreciated all the messages of love and comfort that have been shared with them. Thank you so very much! Carol > >> From: ljknutsen(a)gmail.com >> Date: February 15, 2013 10:55:13 AM EST >> >> Subject: Helen Newkirk's Memorial - Program and Eulogy >> Reply-To: ljknutsen(a)gmail.com >> >> Hi all, >> >> Attached are the program for Mom's memorial service on Wednesday >> (02/13/2013) - these will also be posted on her Facebook page along >> with the video, which Lester is uploading now. If you are not >> already her Facebook 'friend,' please continue to send those >> requests and we will accept them! >> >> Peace and Love, >> Linda, Patricia, Jim, Dave, and Lisa >> >> >> > > >

2 1

ARCHIVES
by Marge Philbrook 16 Feb '13

16 Feb '13

Using this email address which is my own personal address, twice I sent an email to the <dialogue(a)lists.wedgeblade.net>. Once I sent an email to the < oe(a)lists.wedgeblade.net>. I thought that I was on both lists to receive email. I did not receive any of these three things I sent. If anyone receives this email please reply to me as you would to anyone else that sends something to the list. Is there anyone who can tell me if everyone else got these messages expect me, or if no one got them. Is there anyone who can tell me how I can get a message to the persons on the list? Marge Philbrook

5 4

Re: [Dialogue] ARCHIVES
by David Walters 15 Feb '13

15 Feb '13

1 0

Re: [Dialogue] ARCHIVES
by Phyllis Hockley 15 Feb '13

15 Feb '13

I got it! Phyllis At 11:32 AM 2/15/2013 -0600, you wrote: >Using this email address which is my own personal address, twice I sent an >email to the ><<mailto:dialogue@lists.wedgeblade.net>dialogue(a)lists.wedgeblade.net>. >Once I sent an email to the ><<mailto:oe@lists.wedgeblade.net>oe(a)lists.wedgeblade.net>. > >I thought that I was on both lists to receive email. I did not receive >any of these three things I sent. > >If anyone receives this email please reply to me as you would to anyone >else that sends something to the list. > > Is there anyone who can tell me if everyone else got these messages > expect me, or if no one got them. > >Is there anyone who can tell me how I can get a message to the persons on >the list? Marge Philbrook >_______________________________________________ >Dialogue mailing list >Dialogue(a)lists.wedgeblade.net >http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/dialogue-wedgeblade.net > >No virus found in this message. >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6105 - Release Date: 02/15/13

2 1