[Dialogue] The Grand Design
jlepps at pc.jaring.my
jlepps at pc.jaring.my
Sun May 20 12:38:47 PDT 2012
Thanks very much, Paul.
This certainly places our discussion in a far more articulate vein.
It's great to see this type of discussion still going on. I hope to
spend much more time with it.
John
At 12:40 PM 5/20/2012, you wrote:
>I enjoyed the debate between Richard Dawkins and Rowan Williams on
>some of these questions:
><http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfQk4NfW7g0>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfQk4NfW7g0
>
>Maybe it adds another dimension...?
>
>Paul
>
>
>
>
>In a message dated 20/05/2012 19:18:12 GMT Daylight Time,
>LAURELCG at aol.com writes:
>Jack,
>
>The Ground of Being that WAS before the big bang, and the
>Evolutionary Impulse (Becoming) that started the big bang, is what
>we've called God. (This I've gleaned from Andrew Cohen.) I agree it
>is all intelligent, but our tiny brains cannot begin to understand
>it. IT is the All, in the phrases, "All that is, is good." and "I am
>One with All That Is." Science is about grappling to understand it.
>Good scientists are usually in awe of what they're discovering. What
>else would keep someone looking in a microscope all day every day
>for years, or whatever laborious process is required in their
>discipline? Scientists like Bryan Swimme and men of faith like
>Thomas Berry sometimes collaborate to come up with inspired works,
>like The Universe Story. This is all just my humble opinion, as is
>the belief that the church, the cutting edge today, is the
>evolutionary spirituality movement. Jean Houston is a recognized
>leader of it and almost invariably ends her internet sessions with
>"These are the times, we are the people."
>
> From the great central valley of California, the center of the Universe,
>Jann
>
>In a message dated 5/20/2012 10:57:34 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
>icabombay at igc.org writes:
>As to the "Grand Design", it is the contention of some that the
>creative process, that which underlies all, is inherently
>intelligent and that intelligence can be understood.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Dialogue mailing list
>Dialogue at lists.wedgeblade.net
>http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/dialogue-wedgeblade.net
>
>_______________________________________________
>Dialogue mailing list
>Dialogue at lists.wedgeblade.net
>http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/dialogue-wedgeblade.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wedgeblade.net/pipermail/dialogue-wedgeblade.net/attachments/20120520/0526ca54/attachment.html>
More information about the Dialogue
mailing list