Question about the social process triangles . . .
I got this question from a fellow I know who is intrigued with the Social Process triangles. Any responses?? He said: I think there are very few people who currently care about the Social Process Triangle as a tool to be used for social transformation. Can you point me to someone is promotes it's use, trains others on at least an biannual basis using it, or has tried to implement it in a recognizable or tangible manner other than the Jenkins? Short mentions in books on other topics is, for my purposes, great, but is there anyone you know using it daily, weekly, or monthly to train or manage something or anything? Jim Wiegel "Life has got a habit of not standing hitched. You got to ride it like you find it.. You got to change with it." Woody Guthrie 401 North Beverly Way, Tolleson, Arizona 85353-2401 +1 623-363-3277 skype: jfredwiegel jfwiegel@yahoo.com www.partnersinparticipation.com Upcoming public course opportunities: ToP Facilitation Methods Coming in February. Ask about an inhouse course ToP Strategic Planning, Oct 9-10, 2012 The AZ Community of Practice meets the 1st Friday of every month Facilitation Mastery : Our Mastering the Technology of Participation program is available in Phoenix in 2012-3. Program begins on Nov 14-16, 2012 See short video http://partnersinparticipation.com/?page_id=55 and website for further details.
BEAUTIFUL. Great question. Lee On Nov 3, 2012, at 7:10 PM, James Wiegel <jfwiegel@yahoo.com> wrote:
I got this question from a fellow I know who is intrigued with the Social Process triangles. Any responses??
He said: I think there are very few people who currently care about the Social Process Triangle as a tool to be used for social transformation. Can you point me to someone is promotes it's use, trains others on at least an biannual basis using it, or has tried to implement it in a recognizable or tangible manner other than the Jenkins? Short mentions in books on other topics is, for my purposes, great, but is there anyone you know using it daily, weekly, or monthly to train or manage something or anything?
Jim Wiegel
"Life has got a habit of not standing hitched. You got to ride it like you find it.. You got to change with it." Woody Guthrie
401 North Beverly Way, Tolleson, Arizona 85353-2401 +1 623-363-3277 skype: jfredwiegel jfwiegel@yahoo.com www.partnersinparticipation.com
Upcoming public course opportunities: ToP Facilitation Methods Coming in February. Ask about an inhouse course ToP Strategic Planning, Oct 9-10, 2012 The AZ Community of Practice meets the 1st Friday of every month Facilitation Mastery : Our Mastering the Technology of Participation program is available in Phoenix in 2012-3. Program begins on Nov 14-16, 2012 See short video http://partnersinparticipation.com/?page_id=55 and website for further details.
Lee Early 19230 Forest Park Dr. NE, A102 Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 Home: (206) 922-3182 Lee's mobile: (425) 212-7997 lees.mail@comcast.net
I used the SPT in every Design Conference I ever did. Actually, I used a revised version of the Social Process we called the Corporate Process Triangle. It was a tool I used to plot "critical issues" from the participants in order to have them form a "Focus Question" as the center piece for the coming LENS. It was a tool. It was used strictly as a way for the client to articulate a Focus Question, the weight of which was worthy of a very healthy investment on their part in terms of money, time off for senior staff, support staff and facilities. The only time I ever saw it taught to a group of other people for their use was at a conference which you attended, Jim, in Washington DC and at which Clancy presented the SPT to the group. We were gathered to design an open source computer model to anticipate social unrest throughout the world. The thesis being that "war fighters" were the last people who ever want to go to war and that when a fast moving or slow moving natural disaster hit or when a fast moving or slow moving human disaster hit, social unrest soon followed and all too often, the place would soon be crawling with good intended volunteers, and civilians. When that effort did not work in addressing the issue, the military would be called in. (I believe Sandy is a good example of a relatively fast moving natural disaster and the process was repeated there too.) The conference was sponsored by the Pentagon's Office of Advance Concepts and Designs and was attended by all service branches, all security and surveillance agencies, several computer modeling thank tanks and universities. The SPT in that context didn't seem to gain much traction. Other facilitators there were Randy Williams, Jean Watts, Dick West, Jim Wiegel, Clancy Mann and myself. Forgive me if I missed someone. The relatively new TV show "Person of Interest" is an example of the use of open source computer input. The main gathering point for the data in our model was the US Navy facility in the Central Pacific. It is operational today. On Nov 3, 2012, at 8:45 PM, Lee Early <lees.mail@comcast.net> wrote:
BEAUTIFUL. Great question.
Lee
On Nov 3, 2012, at 7:10 PM, James Wiegel <jfwiegel@yahoo.com> wrote:
I got this question from a fellow I know who is intrigued with the Social Process triangles. Any responses??
He said: I think there are very few people who currently care about the Social Process Triangle as a tool to be used for social transformation. Can you point me to someone is promotes it's use, trains others on at least an biannual basis using it, or has tried to implement it in a recognizable or tangible manner other than the Jenkins? Short mentions in books on other topics is, for my purposes, great, but is there anyone you know using it daily, weekly, or monthly to train or manage something or anything?
Jim Wiegel
"Life has got a habit of not standing hitched. You got to ride it like you find it.. You got to change with it." Woody Guthrie
401 North Beverly Way, Tolleson, Arizona 85353-2401 +1 623-363-3277 skype: jfredwiegel jfwiegel@yahoo.com www.partnersinparticipation.com
Upcoming public course opportunities: ToP Facilitation Methods Coming in February. Ask about an inhouse course ToP Strategic Planning, Oct 9-10, 2012 The AZ Community of Practice meets the 1st Friday of every month Facilitation Mastery : Our Mastering the Technology of Participation program is available in Phoenix in 2012-3. Program begins on Nov 14-16, 2012 See short video http://partnersinparticipation.com/?page_id=55 and website for further details.
Lee Early 19230 Forest Park Dr. NE, A102 Lake Forest Park, WA 98155
Home: (206) 922-3182 Lee's mobile: (425) 212-7997
lees.mail@comcast.net
_______________________________________________ Dialogue mailing list Dialogue@lists.wedgeblade.net http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/dialogue-wedgeblade.net
Lee Early 19230 Forest Park Dr. NE, A102 Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 Home: (206) 922-3182 Lee's mobile: (425) 212-7997 lees.mail@comcast.net
Jim, As you know I have used the social process triangles in the work I am doing on sustainable development to explain to NGOs working with the UN what cultural transformation as compared with (but not as opposed to) social transformation. I don't teach it, but I am working on a course for religious, spiritual and secular values-based organiztions that may include the triangles. Herman _____ From: James Wiegel [mailto:jfwiegel@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 10:10 PM To: Jack Gilles (Google Drive); Colleague Dialogue; OE list serve Cc: jeanwatts@cox.net; synergi@yahoo.com; david@mirrorcommunication.com; cmann@umuc.edu; markdove543@gmail.com; jgmarshall@cableone.net; thefishels@earthlink.net; billgrow@verizon.net; larrydloeppke@mchsi.com; jlepps@pc.jaring.my; icalarry@ms69.hinet.net; rcwmbw@yahoo.com; InaRja@comcast.net; vinodkamalaparekh@gmail.com; bailey03132@charter.net; janetasanders@hotmail.com; marilyncrocker@juno.com; cfhahn30@gmail.com; stovern@bellsouth.net; jimandjo@sbcglobal.net; clingojr@aol.com; m.george.walters@verizon.net; gharper1@mindspring.com; stevehar11201@gmail.com; bparker175@cox.net; LenH@efn.org; wnelson@ica-associates.ca; geowanda@earthlink.net; george.packard1@rcn.com; Larry@thelotusinstitute.org; hfgreene@mindspring.com; lees.mail@comcast.net; jpatterson@abbeynorth.ca; lelajahn@hotmail.com; bergdall@gmail.com; joseph.slicker@gmail.com Subject: Question about the social process triangles . . . I got this question from a fellow I know who is intrigued with the Social Process triangles. Any responses?? He said: I think there are very few people who currently care about the Social Process Triangle as a tool to be used for social transformation. Can you point me to someone is promotes it's use, trains others on at least an biannual basis using it, or has tried to implement it in a recognizable or tangible manner other than the Jenkins? Short mentions in books on other topics is, for my purposes, great, but is there anyone you know using it daily, weekly, or monthly to train or manage something or anything? Jim Wiegel "Life has got a habit of not standing hitched. You got to ride it like you find it.. You got to change with it." Woody Guthrie 401 North Beverly Way, Tolleson, Arizona 85353-2401 +1 623-363-3277 skype: jfredwiegel jfwiegel@yahoo.com www.partnersinparticipation.com Upcoming public course opportunities: ToP Facilitation Methods Coming in February. Ask about an inhouse course ToP Strategic Planning, Oct 9-10, 2012 The AZ Community of Practice meets the 1st Friday of every month Facilitation Mastery : Our Mastering the Technology of Participation program is available in Phoenix in 2012-3. Program begins on Nov 14-16, 2012 See short video http://partnersinparticipation.com/?page_id=55 and website for further details.
I ask similar questions. I think we could make a lot more use of it in our consulting work. There are a couple of very simple reasons for low level use. They may not be universally valid, but they are operating images. One is that wrapping people's heads around yet another mental model in a 2 day event is a bit much if you are not going to use it throughout the event. The other reason is, I think, simply time. To use them in any real depth takes time - more than most clients will commit. A more substantial reason we aren't using them, I suppose, is what people ask us to do with their groups. We are not often asked for results that really require a social process analysis. Requests tend to lead us to use the Workshop Method; so we are more inclined to gestalt without interposing a screen. A very well targeted focus question provides a screen of its own and helps people find meaningful patterns. We do teach the Social Processes in our Organizational Transformation course. In the same course, we also use the version developed by Priscilla Wilson, Joel Wright et.al. They are expressed in clear, non-academic terminology that people in organizations grasp immediately. I think they are brilliant. We teach the course 2- 3 times a year. Perhaps our most dramatic use of the social processes was in a major consultation about Distance Education in Alberta. We used the triangles to cluster concerns, trends and directions related to distance education. That work identified areas of major attention. Those areas were used as the foundation for a large scale strategic scenario building process. I think that could be one it's most powerful uses. One of the random thoughts that has passed my mind recently is that there is more activity to be seen in the dynamical interactions than in the processes themselves. It is, I believe, the dynamical relations that show the nature of the imbalances most clearly. We can easily see the major imbalances as we described them. It is in the way these processes relate to each other that twists them out of shape. I think an analysis of the relationships would reveal the depth and texture of our social function and dysfunction in ways we may not be seeing it. It's brilliance is in it's ability to take us out of our familiar social narratives - the tapes we play in our heads. \\/ - - - - - - - - - - Wayne Nelson wnelson@ica-associates.ca O - 416-691-2316 M - 647-229-6910
Dear Wayne, et. all., I wonder if the social process triangles are more important for our own thinking as teachers than they are as explicit content for most of our various courses. What interested me most right now about these triangles is how they can help revolutionary leadership be more comprehensive in their thinking. The whole progressive movement needs more unity and inclusivity. I have recently been brainstorming whistle points over against my latest version of the social process triangles. I will attach it to show what I mean, Gene On Nov 4, 2012, at 8:59 PM, Wayne Nelson wrote:
I ask similar questions. I think we could make a lot more use of it in our consulting work. There are a couple of very simple reasons for low level use. They may not be universally valid, but they are operating images.
One is that wrapping people's heads around yet another mental model in a 2 day event is a bit much if you are not going to use it throughout the event. The other reason is, I think, simply time. To use them in any real depth takes time - more than most clients will commit.
A more substantial reason we aren't using them, I suppose, is what people ask us to do with their groups. We are not often asked for results that really require a social process analysis. Requests tend to lead us to use the Workshop Method; so we are more inclined to gestalt without interposing a screen. A very well targeted focus question provides a screen of its own and helps people find meaningful patterns.
We do teach the Social Processes in our Organizational Transformation course. In the same course, we also use the version developed by Priscilla Wilson, Joel Wright et.al. They are expressed in clear, non-academic terminology that people in organizations grasp immediately. I think they are brilliant. We teach the course 2- 3 times a year.
Perhaps our most dramatic use of the social processes was in a major consultation about Distance Education in Alberta. We used the triangles to cluster concerns, trends and directions related to distance education. That work identified areas of major attention. Those areas were used as the foundation for a large scale strategic scenario building process. I think that could be one it's most powerful uses.
One of the random thoughts that has passed my mind recently is that there is more activity to be seen in the dynamical interactions than in the processes themselves. It is, I believe, the dynamical relations that show the nature of the imbalances most clearly. We can easily see the major imbalances as we described them. It is in the way these processes relate to each other that twists them out of shape. I think an analysis of the relationships would reveal the depth and texture of our social function and dysfunction in ways we may not be seeing it. It's brilliance is in it's ability to take us out of our familiar social narratives - the tapes we play in our heads.
\\/
- - - - - - - - - - Wayne Nelson wnelson@ica-associates.ca O - 416-691-2316 M - 647-229-6910
Gene, By Food Banks are you referring to local food security/food soveignty/seed banks/local organic farms and gardens? Ellie elliestock@aol.com Dear Wayne, et. all., I wonder if the social process triangles are more important for our own thinking as teachers than they are as explicit content for most of our various courses. What interested me most right now about these triangles is how they can help revolutionary leadership be more comprehensive in their thinking. The whole progressive movement needs more unity and inclusivity. I have recently been brainstorming whistle points over against my latest version of the social process triangles. I will attach it to show what I mean, Gene On Nov 4, 2012, at 8:59 PM, Wayne Nelson wrote: I ask similar questions. I think we could make a lot more use of it in our consulting work. There are a couple of very simple reasons for low level use. They may not be universally valid, but they are operating images. One is that wrapping people's heads around yet another mental model in a 2 day event is a bit much if you are not going to use it throughout the event. The other reason is, I think, simply time. To use them in any real depth takes time - more than most clients will commit. A more substantial reason we aren't using them, I suppose, is what people ask us to do with their groups. We are not often asked for results that really require a social process analysis. Requests tend to lead us to use the Workshop Method; so we are more inclined to gestalt without interposing a screen. A very well targeted focus question provides a screen of its own and helps people find meaningful patterns. We do teach the Social Processes in our Organizational Transformation course. In the same course, we also use the version developed by Priscilla Wilson, Joel Wright et.al. They are expressed in clear, non-academic terminology that people in organizations grasp immediately. I think they are brilliant. We teach the course 2- 3 times a year. Perhaps our most dramatic use of the social processes was in a major consultation about Distance Education in Alberta. We used the triangles to cluster concerns, trends and directions related to distance education. That work identified areas of major attention. Those areas were used as the foundation for a large scale strategic scenario building process. I think that could be one it's most powerful uses. One of the random thoughts that has passed my mind recently is that there is more activity to be seen in the dynamical interactions than in the processes themselves. It is, I believe, the dynamical relations that show the nature of the imbalances most clearly. We can easily see the major imbalances as we described them. It is in the way these processes relate to each other that twists them out of shape. I think an analysis of the relationships would reveal the depth and texture of our social function and dysfunction in ways we may not be seeing it. It's brilliance is in it's ability to take us out of our familiar social narratives - the tapes we play in our heads. \\/ - - - - - - - - - - Wayne Nelson wnelson@ica-associates.ca O - 416-691-2316 M - 647-229-6910 _______________________________________________ Dialogue mailing list Dialogue@lists.wedgeblade.net http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/dialogue-wedgeblade.net
Gene, By Food Banks are you referring to local food security/food soveignty/seed banks/local organic farms and gardens? Ellie elliestock@aol.com -----Original Message----- From: Gene Marshall <jgmarshall@cableone.net> To: Wayne Nelson <wnelson@ica-associates.ca> Cc: Jean Watts <jeanwatts@cox.net>; Colleague Dialogue <dialogue@wedgeblade.net>; Jan Sanders <janetasanders@hotmail.com>; Herman Greene <hfgreene@mindspring.com>; Bill & Nan Grow <billgrow@verizon.net>; James Wheeler <jimandjo@sbcglobal.net>; Leonard Hockley <LenH@efn.org>; vinodkamalaparekh <vinodkamalaparekh@gmail.com>; Larry Philbrook <icalarry@ms69.hinet.net>; Larry Ward <Larry@thelotusinstitute.org>; Nelson Stover <stovern@bellsouth.net>; Larry Loeppke <larrydloeppke@mchsi.com>; Marianne and Clancey Mann <cmann@umuc.edu>; James Addington <InaRja@comcast.net>; steve har <stevehar11201@gmail.com>; Bob Fishel <thefishels@earthlink.net>; david <david@mirrorcommunication.com>; Terry Bergdall <bergdall@gmail.com> Sent: Mon, Nov 5, 2012 10:57 am Subject: Re: [Dialogue] Question about the social process triangles . . . Dear Wayne, et. all., I wonder if the social process triangles are more important for our own thinking as teachers than they are as explicit content for most of our various courses. What interested me most right now about these triangles is how they can help revolutionary leadership be more comprehensive in their thinking. The whole progressive movement needs more unity and inclusivity. I have recently been brainstorming whistle points over against my latest version of the social process triangles. I will attach it to show what I mean, Gene On Nov 4, 2012, at 8:59 PM, Wayne Nelson wrote: I ask similar questions. I think we could make a lot more use of it in our consulting work. There are a couple of very simple reasons for low level use. They may not be universally valid, but they are operating images. One is that wrapping people's heads around yet another mental model in a 2 day event is a bit much if you are not going to use it throughout the event. The other reason is, I think, simply time. To use them in any real depth takes time - more than most clients will commit. A more substantial reason we aren't using them, I suppose, is what people ask us to do with their groups. We are not often asked for results that really require a social process analysis. Requests tend to lead us to use the Workshop Method; so we are more inclined to gestalt without interposing a screen. A very well targeted focus question provides a screen of its own and helps people find meaningful patterns. We do teach the Social Processes in our Organizational Transformation course. In the same course, we also use the version developed by Priscilla Wilson, Joel Wright et.al. They are expressed in clear, non-academic terminology that people in organizations grasp immediately. I think they are brilliant. We teach the course 2- 3 times a year. Perhaps our most dramatic use of the social processes was in a major consultation about Distance Education in Alberta. We used the triangles to cluster concerns, trends and directions related to distance education. That work identified areas of major attention. Those areas were used as the foundation for a large scale strategic scenario building process. I think that could be one it's most powerful uses. One of the random thoughts that has passed my mind recently is that there is more activity to be seen in the dynamical interactions than in the processes themselves. It is, I believe, the dynamical relations that show the nature of the imbalances most clearly. We can easily see the major imbalances as we described them. It is in the way these processes relate to each other that twists them out of shape. I think an analysis of the relationships would reveal the depth and texture of our social function and dysfunction in ways we may not be seeing it. It's brilliance is in it's ability to take us out of our familiar social narratives - the tapes we play in our heads. \\/ - - - - - - - - - - Wayne Nelson wnelson@ica-associates.ca O - 416-691-2316 M - 647-229-6910 _______________________________________________ Dialogue mailing list Dialogue@lists.wedgeblade.net http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/dialogue-wedgeblade.net
Eunice and I use the triangles (social and corporate) mostly in context setting to remind people of the big picture, often along with environmental scanning exercises prior to planning sessions, sometime just as the framework for a conversation. These triangles are one of the greatest research efforts of OE/EI/ICA and thank God the Jenkins wrote their book, that Clancy and Epps are also published and using them regularly. Sadly still one of the best kept secrets of our modest-to-a-fault culture. ToP as a whole is much more widely known, but we are nearly unknown by many people who know about Open Space, the Dialogue Method, World Café, and many other that are in the literature and which pop up quickly in a facilitation search. SO who among us has the talent and the passion to raise the public profile of Triangles and ToP?! Ive only done a little in this regard, usually just running off to another program rather than reflecting and sharing insights from the last one. So There. Confession. (what comes after that?) Ciao, from Roma back with the UN for two weeks. / Sherwood From: oe-bounces@lists.wedgeblade.net [mailto:oe-bounces@lists.wedgeblade.net] On Behalf Of James Wiegel Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 3:10 AM To: Jack Gilles (Google Drive); Colleague Dialogue; OE list serve Cc: jeanwatts@cox.net; janetasanders@hotmail.com; jpatterson@abbeynorth.ca; billgrow@verizon.net; jimandjo@sbcglobal.net; lees.mail@comcast.net; wnelson@ica-associates.ca; LenH@efn.org; vinodkamalaparekh@gmail.com; icalarry@ms69.hinet.net; Larry@thelotusinstitute.org; stovern@bellsouth.net; larrydloeppke@mchsi.com; jgmarshall@cableone.net; cmann@umuc.edu; InaRja@comcast.net; stevehar11201@gmail.com; thefishels@earthlink.net; david@mirrorcommunication.com; bergdall@gmail.com Subject: [Oe List ...] Question about the social process triangles . . . I got this question from a fellow I know who is intrigued with the Social Process triangles. Any responses?? He said: I think there are very few people who currently care about the Social Process Triangle as a tool to be used for social transformation. Can you point me to someone is promotes it's use, trains others on at least an biannual basis using it, or has tried to implement it in a recognizable or tangible manner other than the Jenkins? Short mentions in books on other topics is, for my purposes, great, but is there anyone you know using it daily, weekly, or monthly to train or manage something or anything? Jim Wiegel "Life has got a habit of not standing hitched. You got to ride it like you find it.. You got to change with it." Woody Guthrie 401 North Beverly Way, Tolleson, Arizona 85353-2401 +1 623-363-3277 skype: jfredwiegel jfwiegel@yahoo.com www.partnersinparticipation.com Upcoming public course opportunities: ToP Facilitation Methods Coming in February. Ask about an inhouse course ToP Strategic Planning, Oct 9-10, 2012 The AZ Community of Practice meets the 1st Friday of every month Facilitation Mastery : Our Mastering the Technology of Participation program is available in Phoenix in 2012-3. Program begins on Nov 14-16, 2012 See short video http://partnersinparticipation.com/?page_id=55 and website for further details.
Jim – one specific way to apply the social process model is discussed in the chapter on CSR “Corporate Social Responsibility” (pp. 291-311), in *Transforming the Legacy*, Vol. II. It outlines a four-step process for a company: a) to systematically conduct a comprehensive *CSR audit* of its operations (by juxtaposing the corporate and social process models, based on all facets of the company’s operations in terms of the perceived needs of its country environments), and b) to identify ways in which a firm can better *align its operations to more effectively address societal needs*. This approach is based on the views that: 1) effective CSR extends beyond merely the design of a firm’s products and services – to encompass all firm dynamics as they effect society – and 2) if done holistically, the positive societal effects of corporate operations (as well as a firm’s reputation) can be maximized and the cost of aligning corporate operations for purposes of CSR can be minimized. I think the LENS process could well be adapted for assisting firms (through workshops) with both aspects a) and b) of a CSR audit. Clancy *From:* James Wiegel [mailto:jfwiegel@yahoo.com] *Sent:* Saturday, November 03, 2012 10:10 PM *To:* Jack Gilles (Google Drive); Colleague Dialogue; OE list serve *Cc:* jeanwatts@cox.net; synergi@yahoo.com; david@mirrorcommunication.com; cmann@umuc.edu; markdove543@gmail.com; jgmarshall@cableone.net; thefishels@earthlink.net; billgrow@verizon.net; larrydloeppke@mchsi.com; jlepps@pc.jaring.my; icalarry@ms69.hinet.net; rcwmbw@yahoo.com; InaRja@comcast.net; vinodkamalaparekh@gmail.com; bailey03132@charter.net; janetasanders@hotmail.com; marilyncrocker@juno.com; cfhahn30@gmail.com; stovern@bellsouth.net; jimandjo@sbcglobal.net; clingojr@aol.com; m.george.walters@verizon.net; gharper1@mindspring.com; stevehar11201@gmail.com; bparker175@cox.net; LenH@efn.org; wnelson@ica-associates.ca; geowanda@earthlink.net; george.packard1@rcn.com; Larry@thelotusinstitute.org; hfgreene@mindspring.com; lees.mail@comcast.net; jpatterson@abbeynorth.ca; lelajahn@hotmail.com; bergdall@gmail.com; joseph.slicker@gmail.com *Subject:* Question about the social process triangles . . . I got this question from a fellow I know who is intrigued with the Social Process triangles. Any responses?? He said: I think there are very few people who currently care about the Social Process Triangle as a tool to be used for social transformation. Can you point me to someone is promotes it's use, trains others on at least an biannual basis using it, or has tried to implement it in a recognizable or tangible manner other than the Jenkins? Short mentions in books on other topics is, for my purposes, great, but is there anyone you know using it daily, weekly, or monthly to train or manage something or anything? Jim Wiegel "Life has got a habit of not standing hitched. You got to ride it like you find it.. You got to change with it." Woody Guthrie 401 North Beverly Way, Tolleson, Arizona 85353-2401 +1 623-363-3277 skype: jfredwiegel jfwiegel@yahoo.com www.partnersinparticipation.com Upcoming public course opportunities: ToP Facilitation Methods Coming in February. Ask about an inhouse course ToP Strategic Planning, Oct 9-10, 2012 The AZ Community of Practice meets the 1st Friday of every month Facilitation Mastery : Our Mastering the Technology of Participation program is available in Phoenix in 2012-3. Program begins on Nov 14-16, 2012 See short video http://partnersinparticipation.com/?page_id=55 and website for further details.
participants (8)
-
Clarence Mann -
Ellie Stock -
Gene Marshall -
Herman Greene -
James Wiegel -
Lee Early -
Sherwood Shankland -
Wayne Nelson