<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Hello Rod,</div><div><br></div><div>Lovely to see your name here! </div><div><br></div><div>I agree strongly with what you and others have said about the Order and its legacy. </div><div><br></div><div>In 1995 when I was on a sabbatical from my Parish here in Sydney, I stayed with Marilyn and Joe Crocker for a night or two. I was on a journey towards Chicago and Seattle and Vancouver Island, visiting with colleagues in each place. </div><div><br></div><div>The Crockers and I chatted about the Order, and all of us said to each other that we had not left the Order, and were a part of the journey continuing, and were surrounded by the ' crimson line'. For me, we continue to be the Order in diaspora, each at our own </div><div><br></div><div>post, and doing the sacrificial deeds on behalf of all. </div><div><br></div><div>Thank you John for opening up the conversation right around the globe. !</div><div><br></div><div>Best wishes and grace peace and love to each one. </div><div><br></div><div>Isobel Bishop. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><br><div apple-content-edited="true">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Isobel and Jim Bishop</div><div><a href="mailto:isobeljimbish@optusnet.com.au">isobeljimbish@optusnet.com.au</a></div><div><br></div></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br><div><div>On 16/06/2017, at 12:44 AM, Rod Rippel via OE <<a href="mailto:oe@lists.wedgeblade.net">oe@lists.wedgeblade.net</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'; ">
<div>Thanks John, For reminding us that The Order is a Dynamic that takes
on many forms in ways unnoticed and catalytic in society.</div>
<div>Rod Rippel</div>
<div style="font-size: small; text-decoration: none; font-family: Calibri; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; display: inline; ">
<div style="FONT: 10pt tahoma">
<div> </div>
<div style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<div style="font-color: black"><b>From:</b> <a title="oe@lists.wedgeblade.net">John Epps via OE</a> </div>
<div><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, June 14, 2017 2:57 PM</div>
<div><b>To:</b> <a title="oe@wedgeblade.net">Order Ecumenical Community</a> </div>
<div><b>Subject:</b> [Oe List ...] The Order and Oaxtapec</div></div></div>
<div> </div></div>
<div style="font-size: small; text-decoration: none; font-family: Calibri; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; display: inline; ">
<div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal" style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal">It has long been claimed that at
the Oaxtapec gathering, the Order was called out of being. That assertion has
long troubled me, and it seems time to clear the air.<br><br><span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal">IMHO, the statement is both
sociologically and theologically inaccurate. A more accurate formulation of what
happened in Mexico was that we went from a structured to a dispersed form.
Something was definitely dissolved at Oaxtapec, but it was not the Order, only a
particular form of the Order.<br><br><span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal">On the sociological side, there
is still a lively “we” that once went under the name “Order Ecumenical.” This
list-serve and the archives workshops represent some manifestations, but more
significant are the personal collegial relationships that persist despite great
demographic, cultural, and geographic differences. “We” continue to communicate
and to celebrate the life milestones of each other. <br><br><span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal">“We” continue to engage in the
mission of catalyzing and caring for those who care – in multiple sectors and
with far greater impact than a single organization could have managed. Some
examples include the ToP Network, the IAF, ICA community development work in
India, Nepal, Australia, and South America, and environmental preservation
efforts in the USA. “We” have published a good number of books making insights
available to a wide audience. Colleagues could fill out the list.
<br><br><span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal">Theologically, the Order is a
historical dynamic that we’ve been privileged to participate in. It is not
something we can disband, even if we wanted to. Just as Niebuhr described the
Church as the “sensitive and responsive ones…” that takes many forms, so also is
the Order composed of those awakened and catalytic ones who care for those who
care. The notion that some of us could dissolve that dynamic confuses the form
from the content (the baby from the bathwater to use a less abstract metaphor).
I’ve come (reluctantly) to see that we were led to dissolve a particular
structure so that the historical dynamic might continue in an enhanced fashion.
<br><br><span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal">Why does this matter? Is it
simply a verbal difference having little to do with anything except the neurosis
of an old theologian? <br><br><span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal">It matters because thinking that
there is no longer an Order prevents us from wrestling with pertinent questions:
How can we remain in touch with the Profound Mystery? How can we continue to
access our common insights? What rites and celebrations are appropriate to a
dispersed body? How can we account to each other and support each other? How can
we stay on the religious and secular edge? What (if any) forms are appropriate
for the global and diverse participants in this historical dynamic? In a time
when hatred and fear of differences is so rampant, what new experiments might
make a difference? What might we learn from <u>Journey to the
East</u>?<br><br><span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal">Collegial comments,
clarifications, corrections, and additions are most welcome.<span></span></p><div style="line-height: normal; "> <br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal">Thanks for reading this.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="LINE-HEIGHT: normal">John Epps</p></div><div>
<br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><hr>
_______________________________________________<br>OE mailing
list<br><a href="mailto:OE@lists.wedgeblade.net">OE@lists.wedgeblade.net</a><br>http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/oe-wedgeblade.net<br></div></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>OE mailing list<br><a href="mailto:OE@lists.wedgeblade.net">OE@lists.wedgeblade.net</a><br>http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/oe-wedgeblade.net<br></blockquote></div><br></body></html>