[Oe List ...] OE Digest, Vol 163, Issue 6

Tue Oct 7 15:23:06 PDT 2025

Earlier Bill wrote, *ICE routinely detains persons showing up for their
immigration hearings in compliance with their court orders.  They are
either detained in disregard of their compliance, or told that their
applications have been ‘administratively terminated’ with no due
process. *(Thank
you, Bill)

I'm looking at a note given to me at a John Lewis Good Trouble protest in
June. The note was written by a woman named Maria who drove to San Marcos
from San Antonio hoping someone at our protest could help her find a
sponsor for her husband who was recently taken to a detention center in
Pearsall, TX. Her husband had been taken by ICE from his work as a cook in
a restaurant. She stressed that he had done everything he was supposed to
have done: his immigration papers had him scheduled for an immigration
hearing, seeking asylum from the violence he escaped in Venezuela. But the
hearing had been cancelled without providing any options to move forward.
And he had been taken from the restaurant job he had had for some time.

All I could do for Maria was to call a good lawyer I know who works on such
cases, and provide the information Maria provided. Maria is poor, a cook
herself in a public school for 11 years. The lawyer promised she would
research some options for Maria in San Antonio and call her the next day.

I read about the ICE raids. I hear talk about immigrants "invading our
nation." Speaking with Maria was my first experience with someone actually
seeking asylum, who was taken away to a detention center by ICE agents. I
felt ashamed and helpless and all alone, in a deep sense of separation.
Even being at a protest with people who look like me holding up protest
signs--seemed disconnected from the suffering of people like Maria and her
husband.

Susan's comments bring me others' perspectives, other ways of seeing the
situation we are in. I am most grateful for having spent an hour or so with
Maria to learn of the human cost of the current immigration policies, to
find a way through the disruption, drama, and damage around us all.

Diann McCabe

On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 3:22 PM Susan Fertig via OE <oe at lists.wedgeblade.net>
wrote:

> But IF (and I clearly say IF) we are harboring criminals in our facility,
> then ICE has the right to come in and remove them. I doubt we are harboring
> criminals, so it’s a moot point.
>
>
>
> *Susan*
>
>
>
> Susan Fertig-Dykes
>
>
>
> *And the Lord shall guide thee continually, and satisfy thy soul in
> drought .  Isaiah 58:11*
>
>
>
> *From:* OE <oe-bounces at lists.wedgeblade.net> *On Behalf Of *Randy
> Williams via OE
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 07, 2025 9:11 AM
> *To:* Order Ecumenical Community <oe at lists.wedgeblade.net>
> *Cc:* Randy Williams <randycw1938 at gmail.com>; Order Ecumenical Community <
> oe at lists.wedgeblade.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [Oe List ...] OE Digest, Vol 163, Issue 6
>
>
>
> I greatly appreciate Bill’s factual analysis with the corroborating
> information and agree fully that this is not a simple situation.
>
>
>
> But to make it as simple as possible in this situation, the ICA notice at
> the front door says something like, if you have a legal right granted by
> the courts to be here, then enter and conduct your business lawfully while
> here. If you don’t have the legal right to be here, then stay the hell out.
> I can’t imagine anything more American than that.
>
>
>
> Randy Williams
>
>
>
> On Oct 7, 2025, at 8:13 AM, Bill Schlesinger via OE <
> oe at lists.wedgeblade.net> wrote:
>
> 
>
> 1.       A partial answer:  You asked: “how is it that people who entered
> our country illegally have any rights--due process or other?”
>
>
>
>
>
> The rights afforded to undocumented persons in the United States are
> derived from the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which guarantee due
> process and equal protection to all "persons" within U.S. borders, not just
> citizens. While the Constitution doesn't specifically mention undocumented
> immigrants, the Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that the word "person"
> applies to them as well.
>
>
>
> I’m confused by your statement, ‘The people that are singled out are not
> citizens.’  U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has detained
> U.S. citizens, sometimes erroneously and in violation of the law. While
> federal policy explicitly states that ICE cannot use its civil immigration
> authority to arrest or detain U.S. citizens, reports and lawsuits have
> documented instances of this happening.
>
>
>
> Wrongful detentions and legal action
>
>    1. Government Accountability Office report: A 2021 GAO report found
>    that between fiscal year 2015 and early 2020, ICE arrested 674 potential
>    U.S. citizens, detained 121, and deported 70. The GAO also found
>    insufficient record-keeping, suggesting the numbers may be higher.
>    2. Recent lawsuits and allegations: As of late 2025, new lawsuits and
>    media reports have detailed multiple wrongful detentions. For example, a
>    U.S.-born construction worker sued the federal government in October 2025
>    after being detained twice by immigration agents during workplace raids.
>
>
>
> The perception is that ICE is racially profiling people rather than
> developing information and acting on it regarding individuals.  In El Paso,
> ICE routinely detains persons showing up for their immigration hearings in
> compliance with their court orders.  They are either detained in disregard
> of their compliance, or told that their applications have been
> ‘administratively terminated’ with no due process.
>
>
>
> Desperate people do desperate things.  However, a substantial body of
> research indicates that undocumented persons generally commit violent
> offenses at significantly lower rates than U.S.-born citizens. The
> assertion that immigrants are more prone to crime is not supported by
> evidence. In fact, national and state-level studies consistently show that
> undocumented immigrants have a lower propensity for both violent and
> property crimes.
>
> Key findings from research
>
> 1.       Texas arrest data: A 2020 study in the Proceedings of the
> National Academy of Sciences used unique data from the Texas Department of
> Public Safety (the only state that records criminal arrests by immigration
> status) to compare felony arrest rates. It found that between 2012 and 2018:
>
> 1.       U.S.-born citizens were over two times more likely to be
> arrested for violent crimes than undocumented immigrants.
>
> 2.       Arrest rates for specific violent felonies, like homicide and
> assault, were considerably lower for undocumented immigrants.
>
> 2.       National Incarceration Rates: A 2025 analysis by the Cato
> Institute
> <https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/immigrants-cut-victimization-rates-boost-crime-reporting> using
> census data found that undocumented immigrants have a lower incarceration
> rate than native-born Americans.
>
> 1.       In 2023, the incarceration rate for undocumented immigrants was
> 613 per 100,000, compared to 1,221 per 100,000 for native-born Americans.
>
> 2.       Even when factoring in detention for immigration violations, the
> incarceration rate for undocumented immigrants remains lower than that of
> native-born citizens.
>
> 3.       FBI data and historical trends: A 2024 analysis by the American
> Immigration Council
> <https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/fact-sheet/debunking-myth-immigrants-and-crime/> found
> that as the share of immigrants in the U.S. population increased between
> 1980 and 2022, the overall crime rate decreased significantly. During this
> period, the violent crime rate dropped by 34.5%
>
>    1. You said, ‘the sheer volume of trafficked individuals who were
>    victimized by those “importing” them into our country.’
>
>
>
> I live in El Paso.  Coyotes – the ‘traffickers’ – have little regard for
> the people they transport and have often left them to die.  Knowing this,
> people still apply to their services even today. They do this out of
> desperation – and faith.  They ‘trust in God’ to see them through in the
> face of gangs and often terror in their home situations (not all regions
> are alike) and see no alternative but finding ‘safe haven’ in the USA.
> Unfortunately neither political party has acted to create a humane and
> functional system to allow legal entry under internationally accepted
> asylum standards.  The system has been politicized with ‘special access’
> for those in favor of the ruling party(ies).  And this changes arbitrarily
> (see what’s happened with Haitians now being sent back to chaos after being
> here for 30 years).
>
>
>
> Lost children – many are DACA recipients and being told that they must now
> go to a country where they do not speak the language, to parents ill
> prepared to receive them.
>
>
>
> This is not a simple situation.
>
>
>
> FWIW
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Schlesinger
>
> (915) 490-6148 Cell
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* OE <oe-bounces at lists.wedgeblade.net> *On Behalf Of *Susan Fertig
> via OE
> *Sent:* Monday, October 6, 2025 7:41 PM
> *To:* Order Ecumenical Community <oe at lists.wedgeblade.net>
> *Cc:* Susan Fertig <sfertig at blueskytech.us>
> *Subject:* Re: [Oe List ...] OE Digest, Vol 163, Issue 6
>
>
>
> Larry, I respect your points.
>
>
>
> My concern is based on:
>
>    2. the hordes of people tearing down the barricades put up to keep
>    them out in the Biden Administration
>    3. the numbers of violent criminals and not so violent criminals that
>    make it difficult to discern who is and who isn’t
>    4. the sheer volume of trafficked individuals who were victimized by
>    those “importing” them into our country
>    5. the number of lost, unaccompanied children who have never been
>    recovered and who should be sent back to their parents
>
>
>
> My lack of concern is based on:
>
> 2.       how is it that people who entered our country illegally have any
> rights--due process or other?
>
> 3.       How is it that we are not worried about ICE officers being
> identified when the hordes of violent protesters and those who openly
> threaten ICE wear masks routinely?
>
>
>
> I do take issue with your assertion that “No matter how many white men go
> on killing sprees in the US we are not singled out…”
>
> I would state that ”No matter how many black or brown or white men…”
>
> The people that are singled out are not American citizens.
>
>
>
> I often find Trump’s rhetoric offensive. I often find he overstates for
> effect, which I don’t condone. I often find him bragging, which I abhor.
>
> That said, I support him as President—God is big enough that He can use
> anybody, no matter how flawed, for His purposes.
>
>
>
> I often find the rhetoric used against the “other side” abhorrent as
> well—to talk of openly supporting killing anyone who doesn’t agree with
> them or suggests an idea that is different is horrible.
>
>
>
> *Susan*
>
>
>
> Susan Fertig-Dykes
>
>
>
> *And the Lord shall guide thee continually, and satisfy thy soul in
> drought .  Isaiah 58:11*
>
>
>
> *From:* OE <oe-bounces at lists.wedgeblade.net> *On Behalf Of *Lawrence
> Philbrook via OE
> *Sent:* Monday, October 06, 2025 9:18 PM
> *To:* oe at lists.wedgeblade.net
> *Cc:* Lawrence Philbrook <icalarry at gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Oe List ...] OE Digest, Vol 163, Issue 6
>
>
>
> Susan you raise a valid question
>
>
>
> The ICE challenge in America and the ICA response, what is the frame of
> reference?
>
>
>
> Yes there is broad agreement that too many illegal and unvetted immigrants
> were allowed into the US.  Especially those who committed crimes in their
> own country and in the US.  *These people are officially the publicized
> target of the ICE raids.*   However Current numbers - 42,755 out of 59,762
> —or 71.5% held in ICE detention have no criminal conviction according to
> data current as of September 21, 2025.
>
>
>
> ICE has responsibility to apprehend and return people who are in the US
> illegally.  They have a difficult and sometimes dangerous job.  It has been
> made more complicated by the political climate and expectations placed on
> them by consecutive administrations.  Their legal status can literally
> change day to day based on the administration withdrawing legal status that
> had been given earlier. The current administration does these changes
> overnight making it very difficult for the “illegals” to know they are
> illegal.  This can affect hundreds of thousands of people with each
> decision.
>
>
>
> The manner in which they implement their job is in question
>
>    1. Do they follow due process laws which are required in our country
>    whether you are a citizen or not
>    2. Do they appear masked, weapons drawn and without warrants
>    3. Do they only stop and arrest illegal immigrants (the worst of the
>    worst criminals) or stop and hold all people who speak Spanish and look
>    like they are immigrants or are at places where “illegals” look for
>    employment to make sure they have caught and deported enough people for
>    their quota.
>    4. The consequence being American Citizens and legal immigrants being
>    handcuffed and held hours or days - disrupting their lives especially those
>    who live paycheck to paycheck simply to make the officers catching process
>    simpler.
>    5. Their leadership is not making it easier to believe they are not
>    intentionally harassing American citizens who “fit the description"
>    6. American citizens who are children are being deported without due
>    process or a care structure.
>
>
>
> As an old white American Male I can not imagine this happening to me.  No
> matter how many white men go on killing sprees in the US we are not singled
> out as an issue.
>
>
>
> Evelyn being Japanese American has family history about the US sending
> troops to round them up and send them to camps.
>
>
>
> ICE and the republican politicians bragging about The Aligator Alcatraz
> with most of the people inside being  without any other criminal actions,
> does not stimulate trust in the system.
>
>
>
> Am I missing something that you are seeing that is different than the
> above?
>
>
>
> With respect,
>
> Larry
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This transmission may contain
> confidential information belonging to the sender that is legally privileged
> and proprietary and may be subject to protection under the law, including
> the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). If you are
> not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing,
> copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have
> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by
> reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without
> reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you
> _______________________________________________
> OE mailing list
> OE at lists.wedgeblade.net
> http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/oe-wedgeblade.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> OE mailing list
> OE at lists.wedgeblade.net
> http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/oe-wedgeblade.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wedgeblade.net/pipermail/oe-wedgeblade.net/attachments/20251007/c1b92dd1/attachment.htm>