[Oe List ...] bizarre

[Mari Crocker]

Hi W.J and other colleagues

I appreciate your analysis, and would add to your assessment of a “cultural backlash against cultural change” and “the perpetuation of the ancient archetype of female subservience,” the side-effects (like those of a deleterious drug)  of "the abused woman syndrome".

My sister typifies the abused woman, who continued to submit to abuse by “staying in the marriage for the sake of the kids", and when she shook loose of marital abuse, she submitted to abuse by her sons, who of course learned from the role model of their father.  One son did it by direct physical and emotional demeaning; the other by distancing himself geographically and abdicating any “hands-on” support to his mother when she was diagnosed with dementia, save for an occasional phone call.

However, despite her dementia, my sister cast her absentee ballot for Kamala.  Even with dementia she saw the light.

Marilyn



> On Oct 28, 2024, at 5:45 PM, W. J. via OE <oe at lists.wedgeblade.net> wrote:
> 
> We're in the closing days of the most bizarre U.S. election campaign in my memory. According to Barack, N.C. Lt. Gov. Robinson, the Repugnant candidate for governor, is a self-described "Black Nazi" who wants to bring back slavery.
> I know that one's hard to beat!
> But it gets worse! 
> Robinson will be defeated on November 5, rather than riding into the governor's mansion on the coattails of Trump's predicted N.C. victory.
> But here's what's worse: 
> Trump could narrowly win in the electoral college while losing the popular vote.
> Or he could narrowly lose the election, refuse to concede, and contest the election by casting doubt on its legitimacy and creating chaos in the electoral college, throwing the election to the House of Representatives.
> The critical voter block that will guarantee either outcome are female Trump voters, almost all of whom are white, and most of whom are not college graduates and are predominantly postmenopausal.
> This raises what is for me a burning question: why would any woman vote for Trump?
> And especially any woman who could conceive?
> Why would any woman not deeply understand that she is personally under threat the second any other woman is personally under threat?
> As well as being a member of a large group that is now directly under attack?
> I just don't get it.
> So, given the racial and gender gap in the American electorate, even if every white male voted for Donald Trump, he would have to lose if every female plus every person of color voted for Kamala. Right?
> Based on this logic, the reality that I just can't predict that Trump will lose is deeply disturbing.
> So I've tried to plumb the mystery of why any female (including my sister, who has voted for Trump twice before) would be determined to vote for Trump despite all the indisputable evidence that electing Trump in 2024 would be disastrous.
> I think it comes down to this: a cultural backlash against global change that is perceived as both virtually inevitable and threatening to the survival of their traditional female gender identity roles. 
> This perception of a diffuse but global threat to their sense of security in their traditional sense of self can lead female Trump voters to unconsciously self-destructive behavior, in that they can vote for Trump while at the same hating him personally as the embodiment of a threatening male dominance that they have had to put up with in their intimate familial relationships.
> In short, females voting for Trump perpetuate the ancient archetype of female subservience.
> In my humble opinion!
> So why are any female voters so profoundly stuck in this personal dilemma? Of rebelling against the dominance of a male establishment by voting for a fascist wanna-be dictator who exudes a shrunken and impotent sense of male dominance while he attacks the American Constitution?
> Perhaps those of you who are female can see more deeply into this contradiction than I can manage. 
> The best I can suggest is to place this existential disturbance somewhere in the area of "cultural impoverishment", and perhaps in the category of being "spiritually vulnerable" to what we used to call "brainwashing". And thus resistant to reality-based messages that contradict personal beliefs that are determined by a myth system.
> I invite your responses.
> And if you're a registered voter, don't neglect to vote!
> 
> Marshall
> 
> Finally, I just can't get why any woman in our group would insist on trashing Kamala. Yet here's what Susan Fertig posted on Facebook:
> 
> <457488282_2891520291010734_7975706897851416784_n.jpg>
> 
> P.S. Maybe Trump thinks of the electoral college as another iteration of Trump University! A scam he can manipulate to get what he wants.
> 
> <457488282_2891520291010734_7975706897851416784_n.jpg>_______________________________________________
> OE mailing list
> OE at lists.wedgeblade.net
> http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/oe-wedgeblade.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wedgeblade.net/pipermail/oe-wedgeblade.net/attachments/20241028/98eac0d5/attachment.htm>