[Oe List ...] ORID—A “Life” Method

[WILLIAM SALMON]

RE: Jack's comment below--
The experience I've had in using the Art Form Conversation method is that unless the "Reflective" questions are used, we face the  same problem of moving too quickly to the Interpretive. Learning to ask the "associative" and/or "objective emotional" followed by the "personal emotional" questions is a real trick that need to be planned out with care. I wish I was better at it. I remember Kaye Hays could lead a conversation down a merry  path driving the conversation deeper and deeper by pushing so damn hard on the Reflective questions. Once as a trainee, I copied her questions down word-for-word--I wonder if I can unearth that piece of legerdemain. 

     Ah, well. Inner Peace,  Bill Salmon


>     On October 24, 2017 at 11:34 AM Seth Longacre via OE <oe at lists.wedgeblade.net> wrote:
> 
>     Oh, I was just going to say the same thing. The reflective really felt missing.
> 
>       Seth T. Longacre
>       Carlsbad, CA
> 
>     "No one man can terrorize a whole nation unless we are all his accomplices”  Edward R. Murrow
> 
>               ———-O0ooo—
>               ———–(——)—
>               ————)–-/—-
>              ————(_/-
>               —-ooo0O—-
>               —-(——)—-
>               —–\-–(–
>               ——\_)-
>      
> 
> 
>         > >         On 24 Oct, 2017, at 10:24 , Jack Gilles via OE <oe at lists.wedgeblade.net mailto:oe at lists.wedgeblade.net > wrote:
> > 
> >         Randy,
> > 
> >         Her `R`question seems to be interpretive to me. I think it is hard for most people to see the necessity of the Reflective level. People don’t know how to process emotional responses or associative events.
> > 
> >         Jack
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >             > > > On Oct 24, 2017, at 10:00, Randy Williams via OE <oe at lists.wedgeblade.net mailto:oe at lists.wedgeblade.net > wrote:
> > > 
> > >             Colleagues,
> > > 
> > >             In her new book Who Do We Choose To Be: Facing Reality, Claiming Leadership, Restoring Sanity, Margaret Wheatley has her own articulation of ORID in four questions which she calls an After Action Review. They are:
> > > 
> > >             O—What just happened?
> > >             R—Why do you think it happened?
> > >             I—What can we learn from this?
> > >             D—How will we apply these learnings?
> > > 
> > >             We have always said that our methods are “life” methods,. Therefore, we didn’t create them, we discovered them. Each time I come across something like this from Wheatley it confirms that they are indeed “life” methods.
> > > 
> > >             I’ve seen other variations of ORID—for example from Peter Senge, in Catholic social theory, and even from my old professor of church history, Albert Outler. His articulation was, for me, the most memorable, in just three, not four,  short questions: What? So What? Now What?
> > > 
> > >             As some of you who also sat with him will recall, Outler was not always so concise.
> > > 
> > >             Randy
> > >             _______________________________________________
> > >             OE mailing list
> > >             OE at lists.wedgeblade.net mailto:OE at lists.wedgeblade.net
> > >             http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/oe-wedgeblade.net
> > > 
> > >         > >         _______________________________________________
> >         OE mailing list
> >         OE at lists.wedgeblade.net mailto:OE at lists.wedgeblade.net
> >         http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/oe-wedgeblade.net
> > 
> >     > 
> 


 

> _______________________________________________
>     OE mailing list
>     OE at lists.wedgeblade.net
>     http://lists.wedgeblade.net/listinfo.cgi/oe-wedgeblade.net
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wedgeblade.net/pipermail/oe-wedgeblade.net/attachments/20171025/4dbe873c/attachment-0002.html>